South Africa needs a fundamental overhaul of its industrial strategy, replacing protectionist policies in favour of maximising exports. But its easier said than done.
A report by the Centre for Development and Enterprise CDE, titled Rethink Growth, Jobs and the DTIC , highlights that achieving this shift will require a re-evaluation of the Department of Trade, Industry and Competitions dtic approach to master plans, tariff structures, and competition policy.
The report, the seventh in a series addressing the priorities of the government of national unity, focuses on strengthening the countrys manufacturing sector, according to Linda Ensor in BusinessLive .
The CDEs findings point to troubling trends in South Africas industrial performance. Between 1960 and 2023, the manufacturing sectors share of GDP fell from 20 to under 13, and employment in manufacturing declined from 1.8 million jobs in 2001 to fewer than 1.6 million in 2023.
Additionally, only 20 of manufacturing firms currently export, with the number of exporters dropping from 42 000 to 36 000 between 2015 and 2022. Of these, more than half export less than 5 of their output.
The CDE noted that some of these challenges lay beyond the departments control, but argued that many of the dtics policies had been counterproductive. Ann Bernstein, the CDEs executive director, observed that policy decisions were designed more to replace imports with local production than to maximise export growth.
She explained that this import-replacement approach had steered South Africa further towards protectionism, undermining the ability of local firms to compete globally and expand their share of international demand for goods.
The CDE further indicated that the dtics localisation policies had hampered competitiveness and negatively impacted employment prospects. It criticised the departments master plan strategy which encompasses industries such as clothing and retail, sugar, steel, agriculture, agri-processing, and furniture for being overly narrow and sector-focused. The report argued that the approach failed to account for the diversity of firms within sectors, which varied in size, profitability, age, and geographical location.
According to the report, firms within a single sector often share a common interest in restricting access for foreign competitors. This tendency, the CDE contended, reinforced the master plan approachs promotion of protectionist measures. Although master plans have provided some protection from foreign competition, they have not led to an increase in manufactured exports.
The CDE advocated for a reorientation of industrial policy to centre on exports. Bernstein explained that exports should become the primary metric for evaluating the competitiveness of firms and the success of policy interventions. She suggested that by making export growth the central objective, policymakers would be compelled to focus on key factors that drove competitiveness, such as reducing input costs and improving productivity. The CDE believes this focus on exports would also strengthen domestic firms, enabling them to compete more effectively with imports. SOURCE BDLive
Sign up to our mailing list and get daily news headlines and weekly features directly to your inbox free. Subscribe to receive print copies of Freight News Features to your door.